techdirt’s hit kind of a new low in the divisive Net Neutrality debate. Mike Masnick writes that the telcos have got their Net Neutrality deal with the FCC because, well, they have some mighty deep pockets, and they’re prepared to use them – either for-or-agin the Dems – come election season. Consequently, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski had no choice but to back down from his Net Neutrality / Reclassification madness and give the big boys what they want.
C’mon, Mike! You make the National Enquirer blush.
The “reporting” follows the well worn meme espoused by the Left that when the going gets tough, and the deal looks like it ain’t cutting their way – then blame the “monopolists” for corrupting the process. Good lord, get a new riff already.
Free Press, Public Knowledge, MAP and OIC lobbyists (among other “reformistas”) have practically installed themselves at the FCC since day one (I think I saw their cots, bedrolls and toiletries there the other day). To claim that they’ve been left-out strains credulity (as this FCC blog reveals).
Let’s see. They’ve gotten their lobbying dollar’s worth out of the Open Internet / Net Neutrality NPRM; the National Broadband Plan; the Wireless Competition Report; the Third Way Statement; the Third Way NOI; the 706 Report; and have supped at the FCC table throughout the “closed-door” Net Neutrality meetings.
Compromise will happen. It should. This is a highly charged debate that has divided many. The FCC hasn’t helped any by trying to avoid the will of Congress, end-running around key court decisions, and attempting to jam an innovation-killing rule down the throats of American broadband consumers.
Though I think the Commission is wrong to try to regulate the Internet through broadband Reclassification, I also recognize that some discussion – possibly one that reaches compromise – should occur.
What I do not think is helpful is the idea, seemingly shared by the public interest groups, that “it’s our way or no way; and if you get in the way of that – then you’re a corrupt SOB.”
Mike, remember the elementary school admonition – “sticks and stones…”? I’ll bet the network providers do, and it’s helped them keep their eye on the ball to ensure that a reasoned ruling comes out of the FCC.
The opposite would be corrupt – a closed process decided by a small handful of elite, “consumer advocates,” impervious to reason, debate or the sunlight of opposing viewpoints. Until this summer, it looked like it was going in this direction. Now, thankfully, the process appears to be more inclusive – one which may result in a more fair outcome for all involved.